(Image credit: AleksandrMorrisovich/Shutterstock)
Hence, a black hole.
These simple yet surprising statements have held up to decades of observations. Astronomers have watched as the atmosphere of a star gets sucked into a black hole. They've seen stars orbit black holes. Physicists on Earth have heard the gravitational waves emitted when black holes collide. We’ve even taken a picture of a black hole’s "shadow" — the hole it carves out from the glow of surrounding gas.
And yet, mysteries remain at the very heart of black hole science. The very property that defines a black hole — the singularity — seems to be physically impossible, because matter can’t actually collapse down to an infinitely tiny point.
Planck engines
Planck engines
That means the current understanding of black holes will eventually need to be updated or replaced with something else that can explain what's at the center of a black hole.
But that doesn’t stop physicists from trying.
One theory of black hole singularities replaces those infinitely tiny points of infinitely compressed matter with something much more palatable: an incredibly tiny point of incredibly compressed matter. This is called a Planck core, because the idea theorizes that the matter inside a black hole is compressed all the way down to the smallest possible scale, the Planck length, which is 1.6 * 10^ minus 35 meters.
That's … small.
With a Planck core, which wouldn’t be a singularity, a black hole would no longer host an event horizon — there would be no place where the gravitational pull exceeds the speed of light. But to outside observers, the gravitational pull would be so strong that it would look and act like an event horizon. Only extremely sensitive observations, which we do not yet have the technology for, would be able to tell the difference.
Dark matter
Radical problems require radical solutions, and so replacing “singularity” with “Planck core” isn’t all that far-fetched, even though the theory is barely more than a faint sketch of an outline, one without the physics or mathematics to confidently describe that kind of environment. In other words, Planck cores are the physics equivalent of spitballing ideas.
That’s a useful thing to do, because singularities need some serious out-of-the-box thinking. And there might be some bonus side-effects. Like, for example, explaining the mystery of dark matter.
Dark matter makes up 85% of the mass of the universe, and yet it never interacts with light. We can only determine its existence through its gravitational effects on normal, luminous matter. For example, we can watch stars orbit the centers of the galaxies, and use their orbital speeds to calculate the total amount of mass in those galaxies.
In a new paper, submitted Feb. 15 to the preprint database arXiv, physicist Igor Nikitin at the Fraunhofer Institute for Scientific Algorithms and Computing in Germany takes the “radical singularity” idea and kicks it up a notch. According to the paper, Planck cores may emit particles (because there’s no event horizon, these black holes aren’t completely black). Those particles could be familiar or something new.
Perhaps, they would be some form of particle that could explain dark matter. If black holes are really Planck stars, Nikitin wrote, and they are constantly emitting a stream of dark matter, they could explain the motions of stars within galaxies.
his idea probably won't hold up to further scrutiny (there’s much more evidence for the existence of dark matter than just its effect on the motion of stars). But it’s a great example of how we need to come up with as many ideas as possible to explain black holes, because we never know what links there may be to other unsolved mysteries in the universe.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий